Project Taurus / Colorado Springs / DEPN-26-0039
Revenue and Economics
Project Taurus job claims, city fee determination, unresolved utility costs, and unresolved subsidy questions.
Economic ledger
Separate jobs, fees, incentives, and utility costs
The record supports a CDI fee determination and applicant job claims. It does not yet support a broad subsidy finding or final ratepayer-cost conclusion.
Jobs
Applicant-attributed employment
Raeden says the project will employ 60-100 permanent staff and have 80-130 onsite personnel. That is not a binding job commitment without later records.
Fees
CDI fee determination
The city approval letter says no Citywide Development Impact Police/Fire fees are required for this modification. That is a fee determination, not a full subsidy finding.
Utility costs
Ratepayer question unresolved
Public CSU materials describe large-load cost-recovery guardrails, but the project-specific service agreement, collateral, studies, and extension-cost records are still needed.
Executed development agreement or incentive agreement would settle whether job or performance terms are binding.
Tax rebate, abatement, utility incentive, grant, or economic-development agreement records would settle broader subsidy claims.
Large Load Service Agreement, study invoices, collateral, and line/substation cost records would settle ratepayer-cost claims.
Payroll reports, compliance records, or performance terms would verify applicant job claims.